Tuesday, June 24, 2025

Handling a Hostile Culture - Tim Keller's Thoughts

The following extended quotation is from a 2021 interview that World Magazine did with Tim Keller.  I find it helpful and formative almost five years later.

"I have heard many fellow Christians accuse you of being a liberal politically."

As the term has been used by the great majority of people in the last several decades, I am not politically liberal. I am not a supporter of a highly centralized, government-controlled economy or of taxes at the level of European socialist countries. I am pro-life. I am, of course, a major supporter of religious liberty, a term that the left now puts in scare quotes and a concept it opposes. Political liberals do not consider me politically liberal.

So why have some people called me a political liberal?

The first reason is that, in a highly politically polarized environment, anyone who is not fully, loudly, and explicitly supporting "your tribe" is now seen as supporting the other side. During the last election I simply said that as a minister, I could not bind Christians’ consciences (see Westminster Confession Ch. 20) and tell them how to vote. That angered many conservative people who believed that any effort to be “apolitical” was really to be on the liberal side

The second reason is because I often preach what the Bible teaches about how Christians should work for and support the poor and needy. Even though I simply expound the Scripture and say nothing about government or taxation, many people believe any such emphasis will lead to higher taxes and bigger government and therefore is “liberal.” This is not true, of course. To say Christians must be deeply concerned for the needs of the poor is simply presenting a Biblical truth and is not speaking to political policy.

Third, many believe that if I am not denunciatory and unfriendly to liberals I must myself be a liberal which is not true. Jesus called us to publicly “greet” and wish peace to not just our own fellow believers but to all (Mt 5:43-48).  Recently on Twitter I congratulated an atheist (Greg Epstein) on being selected as head chaplain at Harvard. He is a man whose views I have publicly debated, and I am on record as having opposed his atheistic beliefs. Yet he has also been friendly to me, and is a man whom insiders know to be more fair-minded and open to allowing all chaplains—including evangelical ones—to do their ministries than some Harvard head chaplains have been in the past. Nevertheless, many on social media expressed their conviction that if you show friendliness to atheists and liberals you must be at the very least a closet liberal yourself. That is not true.

This is an excerpt from a long, wide-ranging and interesting two-part interview.  The whole thing is worth your time and consideration.  CLICK HERE to read it.


Monday, June 9, 2025

Birmingham and Los Angeles - Different Leaders, Different Values

This past Saturday while in Atlanta for the wedding of our nephew, Mary Lynn and I took time to visit the Martin Luther King, Jr. National Historical Park.  It was a great three hours of history, information and inspiration.

Ironically - I write this on the following Monday - Los Angeles began to be engulfed in protests over federal ICE arrests at the same time.  There is a lot going on with much back-and-forth and I have no idea how things will play out from here.  I'm a pastor, not a predictive prophet.  There is more than I can address in a single post - while on vacation.

But I am sadly struck by how far we have fallen from Dr King's leadership.  These protestors are not marching in his footsteps, following his example or committed to his values.  That is the single point that I want to keep before us with this post. Those who marched with Dr King:

  • Never wore masks.
  • Never advocated violence or harbored violent agitators.

In January of 2021, I posted "Marching With Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr" - CLICK HERE for the full post.  In that post, I included the "Ten Commandments" for participating in the Birmingham, AL Bus boycott.  However things play out, it is worth reposting those principles, as I have below.

Every volunteer was required to sign a Commitment Card that read:

I hereby pledge myself—my person and body—to the nonviolent movement. Therefore I will keep the following ten commandments:

1. Meditate daily on the teachings and life of Jesus

2. Remember always that the non—violent movement in Birmingham seeks justice and reconciliation — not victory.

3. Walk and talk in the manner of love, for God is love.

4. Pray daily to be used by God in order that all men might be free.

5. Sacrifice personal wishes in order that all men might be free.

6. Observe with both friend and foe the ordinary rules of courtesy.

7. Seek to perform regular service for others and for the world.

8. Refrain from the violence of fist, tongue, or heart

9. Strive to be in good spiritual and bodily health.

10. Follow the directions of the movement and of the captain on a demonstration.

I sign this pledge, having seriously considered what I do and with the determination and will to persevere.

From the 1963 book Why We Can't Wait by Dr. Martin Luther, Jr. - p. 64

Monday, June 2, 2025

Evangelicalism - A Global Movement

I've posted before regarding the meaning and confusion around the term "evangelical" and why clarifying that understanding is important to me.

You can revisit those posts here:
  • "So What Do You Mean By 'Evangelical'?" - 1/21/21 - CLICK HERE
  • What Do You Mean By "Evangelical?" - 1/17/24 - CLICK HERE
I came across a review of the book Soul By Soul: The Evangelical Mission to Spread the Gospel to Muslims by Adriana Carranca recently that added insight to that question: What Do You Mean By "Evangelical"?  The reviewer makes two particular points that I often point out:
  • Evangelicalism - as understood for over four centuries and represented by the National Association of Evangelicals - CLICK HERE for their website with their definition - is an international movement, with particular convictions and history.  It is more than a recent category of American political identity.
  • There is an amazing work of God happening this very day among Muslim people across the globe, and "Global Evangelicals" are deeply involved.
Below is an extended quotation from that review:

We now know that the demographic center of Christianity shifted to the Global South during the 20th century in dramatic fashion, and we also know a lot more about how it actually happened. Evangelicalism, as one of the fastest-growing demographic blocs within global Christianity, has contributed significantly to these transformations.

Today, more than 77 percent of the world’s evangelicals are Africans, Asians, and Latin Americans. Even if a significant number of American evangelicals may favor some form of Christian nationalism (though the numbers are likely exaggerated), and even if a majority of white American evangelicals voted for Donald Trump, what often goes unstated is that the vast majority of the world’s evangelicals are neither white nor American. Evangelicals around the world are not united on matters of politics and race, but they lay great stress on the Bible, the central message of the Cross, and man’s need for conversion.

Evangelicalism, then, is plainly not an American movement. The vast majority of the world’s evangelicals live in the Global South, and they are actively engaged in sending missionaries to the ends of the earth. The World Council of Churches began using the language of “witness in six continents” in the early 1960s to describe how new mission centers were now established on every continent in the world.

When evangelicals gathered in Lausanne, Switzerland, in 1974, for the First International Congress on World Evangelization, they observed that the dominant role of Western missions was fast disappearing. In the 1980s, Luis Bush, an unassuming evangelical from Argentina who became an influential mission leader, coined the expression “the 10/40 Window.” The name referred to the regions of North Africa, South and Southeast Asia, and the Middle East, concentrated in a single geographic rectangle between 10 and 40 degrees north of the equator.

Bush was hoping to mobilize evangelical missionary movements from Africa, Asia, and Latin America into places Western missionaries found it harder to reach. He made it clear throughout the 1990s that these missionary efforts would be led not by Americans but by Christian leaders in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.

Americans popularized “10/40 Window” language in mission circles, but Bush was holding massive gatherings in Africa, Asia, and Latin America to mobilize missionaries from the Global South. Today, nearly half of the world’s full-time cross-cultural missionaries are being sent out from the Global South, with countries like Brazil, South Korea, and India figuring among the top senders.

Adriana Carranca describes some of these global transformations in her new book Soul by Soul: The Evangelical Mission to Spread the Gospel to Muslims. Carranca is a Brazilian writer who has worked as a war correspondent and investigative journalist in some of the most difficult places in the world.

Educated at Columbia University and the London School of Economics, she has traveled widely in Africa and the Middle East, covering events like the American-led invasion of Afghanistan, the Peshawar church bombing in Pakistan, the Lord’s Resistance Army uprising in northern Uganda, the Islamic revolution in Iran, and the Arab Spring in Egypt. While Carranca was working in conflict zones and refugee camps, she began meeting evangelicals looking to reach Muslims with the gospel.

As a secular journalist who had spent time in American contexts, Carranca knew something about American evangelicalism. But what she discovered while working in Africa and the Middle East surprised her. Most of the evangelical missionaries she met were not from the United States. Instead, they were being sent out to the Muslim world from places like Brazil, Columbia, Mexico, South Africa, China, and South Korea. The evangelical mission to Muslims, she learned, was emanating from the Global South.

In 2008, Carranca was in Kabul covering the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan. Here, she first heard about significant numbers of Muslims who were converting to Christianity. This evangelistic endeavor, she discovered, was being led by an evangelical, Luiz, who hailed from her home country of Brazil. He was part of a network of other evangelicals from the Global South.  .  .  .

.  .  .  During her travels, Carranca gained rare access to what she called the “secret world” of Christian missionaries evangelizing Muslims. She also learned about the influence of Luis Bush and traveled to meet him in Indonesia, where he was mobilizing thousands of missionaries from Asia to preach the gospel to Muslims.

Carranca’s long-form journalism is serious, intimate, and gripping. Though not a believer, she confesses that she came to admire the evangelicals who became her friends. The book introduces readers to Luiz and Gis and their coworkers from South Africa, Brazil, China, and South Korea, and talks about their daily lives, their love for soccer, and the joy they find in spending time with Muslim friends.

Carranca’s narrative includes riveting eyewitness accounts of terrorist attacks, drone strikes, police inquiries, church bombings, and the martyrdom of local Christians in Pakistan and Afghanistan. In one powerful anecdote, she talks about the murder of a missionary family she befriended in Afghanistan, killed by the Taliban in a brutal shooting. She flew to Pretoria, in South Africa, to attend their funeral services, where their graves were marked with a popular refrain echoing Tertullian’s words about the blood of martyrs: “They tried to bury us. They didn’t know we were seeds.”

Soul by Soul introduces readers to some of the new faces of evangelicalism—and they are almost nothing like Barbara Kingsolver’s unflattering caricature of a failed missionary to the Congo in her popular novel The Poisonwood Bible. Rather than fictional white Southern Baptists from Georgia who are more misanthropes than missionaries, Carranca gives us real people, unmarked by what she calls the “arrogance and triumphalism” that has sometimes been associated with Western missionaries.

CLICK HERE for the entire review: Inside the ‘Secret World’ of Global Evangelism to Muslims by F. Lionel Young III

Tuesday, May 20, 2025

The Gospel of God's Grace and Diversity In His Creation

I'm a big fan of "diversity" because I observe it in God's Creation.

Here is what I mean: Walk through Holland during our Tulip Time festival and you will notice the diversity of tulips.  Do some people-watching during the parade and you will see a similar diversity among all the cheering people.  Because I think that people and life are not an accident, it is easy for me to conclude that the LORD God values diversity in the world He created.

There are two other important aspects related to the diversity that God created: Unity and Redemption for Reconciliation.

By unity, I mean simply that tulips - for all their diversity - are still tulips.  They are not roses. A wide and diverse variety of tulips are still tulips.

It is the same with people.  Tall, short, black, white and so on.  There is a lot of diversity, but we are all united as human beings.  As a Christ-follower,  I believe that for all our apparent diversity, every person is united as an image-bearer of the Living God.  We're diverse, but all hold that in common.  That's the unity of diverse humans.

Unfortunately, there is a problem in God's creation that disrupts and damages this balance of unity and diversity. Sin is the classical term for it.  Among other things, that sin breaks our experience of unity, the relationship with other humans based on our shared bearing of the image of God.  We fall short of our created intention, and end up hurting one another, as well as God's creation.  God's answer to that is the Gospel: Redemption and Reconciliation.  Jesus redeems us from sin and reconciles us to God AND to one another.  That's really good news - even as we wait for its completion.

So I'm a big fan of diversity and see it as a reflection of God's character and the Gospel.

But I'm not a big fan of diversity rhetoric or policies - yes, I'm thinking of most Diversity, Equity and Inclusion sorts of policies here - because they leave out those important components: Unity and Redemption for Reconciliation.

As I listen to the cultural conversations of our moment, I am increasingly hearing a view of the life that divides humanity into two groups: good guys vs bad guys.  Depending on the agenda, that can be Bourgeoisie vs Proletariat, racist vs anti-racist, straight vs gay.  You could go on and on.  Conflict is the energy that drives this view of life.  What is lacking in any sense of a deeper connection between the human beings in these conflicting groups.

Also missing is any means of reconciliation between these conflicting groups.  Conflict is resolved by victory.  It is a zero-sum, either/or, win/lose view of life and relationships with no way to redeem the wrongs and bring reconciliation between both parties with flourishing for all.

Here is a concrete example of the difference between the Gospel view of unity and the other: Have you heard any hope of resolution between Israelis and Palestinians?  I haven't.  It's either "from the River to the sea" with one side or "we will never forget" for the other.  I could go on with each conflicting side in every contentious division.

The Gospel offers a hope to this conflict.  That hope is based on the common humanity of Palestinians and Israelis as image-bearers of God redeemed and reconciled through Jesus.

So if you are trying to work through your thoughts on diversity and various policies, my counsel would be to have you look for two things.

  • First, is there an underlying sense of a unity between the people in each of the conflicting groups that is greater than the conflict itself?  There may be conflict or injustice, but is there something deeper and more important that can bring the parties together.
  • Second, is the end of the process redemption and reconciliation?  If something has been broken, how is it made right, so that the people of the two conflicting groups can return to loving relationship?

Here is a concrete example with regard to racial issues.  Consider the differences in speech, action and outcomes between Dr Martin Luther King, Jr and the Black Lives Matter movement.  Both faced and responded to racial injustice.  Dr King was a Baptist pastor who saw his opponents as fellow humans, even sometimes fellow believers in Christ!  He used non-violent means to pursue reconciliation and justice.   His "I Have A Dream" sermon has appeal and hope for everyone regardless of race or politics.  Observe the Black Lives movement or read the books of Ibrim X. Kandi and you will find little common ground between "racist" and "anti-racists" with an anger that will never allow restitution, restoration or reconciliation.  The reason for this is that Dr King lived from a gospel worldview and BLM was based on something very different indeed.

The celebration of diversity in God's creation is based on an underlying unity that grows from seeing all people as image-bearers of our Creator.  Restoring that unity is costly though, because it is offered through redemption of the brokenness that makes possible reconciliation between the conflicting groups.  Reconciliation, not just victory, is the final goal of the work of Jesus in the Gospel.

Tuesday, April 15, 2025

My View on Gospel-Centered Pastoral Care With Gender Dysphoria

From Thanksgiving to New Year's in 2023 I had encounters with friends after every single worship service that would go something like this:

The family dinner/gathering/reunion is going to be really different this holiday.  We have already been informed that our son/daughter/grandchild/niece/nephew/cousin's child is "transitioning" gender, has a new name and expects us to use different pronouns.  Pastor Bill, can you help me sort this out?!?

Each week and after every service, a new face and different family, but with the same basic dilema: How do we navigate the questions raised by transgenderism in our family and community?

I've been reading, praying and studying both before and since then, but this is the first time I have offered resources or comment publicly in this way.

If you read nothing else, I'd say CLICK HERE for a recent post by Dr Leonard Sax for the Institute of Family Studies.  Dr Sax is a practicing pediatrician and PhD social researcher that I have followed for years and grown to trust and appreciate.  Though his title is a distraction, I think that this is the best single piece I have seen outlining the current state of medical/social/legal research.

If you are still reading, here are two personal reflections that I will offer:

  • There is not a lot of scientific/medical research on transgenderism.  Simply put, the desire and ability to preform hormone and surgical procedures like this is so new, that there have simply not been enough people and time for us to observe long-term effects.
  • Recommendations are changing.  There is a lot more to say about this but for example:
    • The US federal recommendations for treatment of minors was altered (very quietly I might add) in June of 2024.  CLICK HERE for a report from the NY Times. 
    • Great Britian has dramatically altered their National Health Service Guidelines for treating gender dysphoria in light of the Cass Report as well.  CLICK HERE for the final report or CLICK HERE for a summary from the NY Times and CLICK HERE for a review by Rebecca MacLaughlin for the Gospel Coalition.

What that means for me as a pastor - specifically an ordained Teaching Elder in the Evangelical Presbyterian Church - is this: I need to communicate the Gospel of God's Grace to a world - I'm thinking particularly about children, parents and grandparents - that is hurting, confused and facing unique options and pressures.  No small task to both speak and be heard with Gospel grace and truth.

For example, given the 2024 change in Federal medical recommendations, there will be parents in my community who started down one path of  "gender-affirming care" for their child only to have it changed along the way.

In addition, there are all sorts of perspectives bombarding people - social media, schools, peers and more - with information of widely varied veracity.  It is easy to be lost in the noise of the moment.  It is very hard to know what terms mean to different people and what experiences or even hearsay they have been exposed to and now bring to their questions.

Therefore,

I want to be clear, kind, factual and Gospel-centered in all that I say as both a public preacher and a personal pastor.  I do believe that the Scriptures and the accumulated wisdom of the church across the ages gives believers helpful support and guidance for even new questions like those related to transgenderism.  I'd be happy to talk specifics if you like.

I am called to love and walk through life with people and to do that even when they disagree with me, or make different choices than I would recommend or are living with consequnces of decisions I could not affirm.  I am a servant of Jesus, the Good Shepherd.  It seems to me, that He never strayed from His identity and mission, never compromised the truth of His Father and was always willing to engage people and share their life.

Interested In Reading More?

My advice: Plan to read a lot, talk with some people, pray a lot and go slowly as you ponder many of the questions raised by the current gender and sexuality changes in our culture.

One consistent source of helpful reflection and material for me has been the Center for Faith, Sexuality and Gender directed by Dr Preston Sprinkle.  We have used their small-group material Grace & Truth with good fruit here at Harderwyk.  CLICK HERE for their website.  CLICK HERE for their Statement of Faith.

I expect to add a few more resources and thoughts on this blog in the future, but this is the place for us to start.

Thursday, March 20, 2025

But I've Heard That The NLT Leaves Out Verses!?!

With a Google Search or skim through various Social Media, it is easy to find statements like:

The New Living Translation (NLT) is straight from Hell.  .  . Let's face it, the corrupters who are publishing demonic bibles are all out to make a fast buck, filthy lucre!  In order to reach the largest market base possible, they trim and water down the Scriptures as much as tolerable.  This is evil.  .  .  As further proof of corruption, Billy Graham endorses the NLT on the front cover jacket.

Friend, don't believe it.  And if it is a person telling you that and not Google, then simply smile graciously and remember to fact check everything else they ever pass along to you.

Here's the real story:

It is true that if you make a verse-by-verse comparison between the King James Verion (KJV) and virtually all 20th century versions - including New International Version (NIV) English Standard Version (ESV), New American Standard Version (NASB), Revised Standard Version (RSV) as well as the NLT - you will find several verses - typically about 16 - "missing" from the KJV to the others.

You should ask "Why is that"?  There is a perfectly good reason for the differences.

The KJV is translated from a specific Greek Manuscript called the Textus Receptus - or "Received Text" - that was assembled from Greek and Latin manuscripts, as well as references from other writings by the scholar Erasmus in the year 1516.  It was best Greek compilation of the time and figured powerfully in the Reformation.

But that was five centuries ago.  And across those five centuries, there has been a great deal of archaelogy and many additional manuscripts discovered that are actually earlier in origin than anything Erasmus had to work from.  I will say that again: Five centuries of archaelogy have discovered manuscripts that predate the sources of Textus Receptus.

The modern translations work from THOSE manuscripts - the older ones - and not Textus Receptus.  The 16 "missing verses" are simply not in the older manuscripts that have been discovered over the past five centuries.  As best we are able to tell - it was not a "xerox copy" sort of process that long ago - the extra versess in the Textus Receptus were added - whether intentionally or by scribal error, often for clarity - centuries after the manuscripts we now have.

So a more-true-to-the-facts way to express matter would be say that the KJV ADDS 16 verses to the Bible.  But take it from me, when someone insists that the modern translations have "missing verses," you had best not upset them by asking why they want a translation of the Bible with "added verses."

Two More Points

No Difference Of Import Here - Simply put, there is no aspect of the life of Jesus, the Gospel of God's Grace or message of the Bible as a whole that is lost by the "missing verses" or added by the "added verse" depending on your preference.  Everything these verse add is already clearly known by other verses - usally many other verses if it is something important - in the rest of the Textus Receptus and modern Greek manuscripts.

No One Is Hiding Anything - The differences between Textus Receptus and the modern manuscripts are all well known, discussed and open to see and deliberate.  Actually, most of the modern translations will include the differences in brackets or a footnote.  Here is an example of that based on John 5:4 from GotQuestions.org

For example, John 5:4 is included in the KJV, but in the NKJV the verse has a footnote attached explaining that it is not found in many Greek texts, the NASB includes the verse in brackets: The NIV places the verse in a footnot, so John 5:4 is "missing" the actual text.

Resources:

Why Are The Newer Translations Of The Bible Missing Verses? from GotQuestions.org

This is a helpful summary - complete with 5 minute video! - of this matter.  CLICK HERE  This is a paragraph from that post:

It is important to remember that the verses in question are of minor significance. None of them change in any way the crucial themes of the Bible, nor do they have any impact on the Bible’s doctrines—Jesus’ death and resurrection; Christ’s being the only way of salvation; and the doctrines of heaven and hell, sin and redemption, and the nature and character of God. These doctrines are preserved intact through the work of the Holy Spirit, who safeguards the Word of God for all generations. It is not a matter of the newer translations missing verses, and it is not a matter of the KJV translators adding to the Bible. It is a matter of determining, through careful research and textual science, what content was most likely part of the original manuscripts of the Bible.

Exactly Which Verses Are In Question

Here is a list of KJV verses not carried into modern translations based on differences with Textus Receptus.  You will find verse, comparison and rationale for each one.  Warning: this is pretty details and arcane, but it is good to know and see to get a sense of the serious evidence and considerations behind the differences.  CLICK HERE for that post.

Tuesday, March 18, 2025

My Favorite Bible Reading Plan EVER!!

I have occasionally used the YouVerion mobile app to access Bible reading plans from Bible.com for years.  They have a wide variety of plans - short and long, topical, seasonal.  The app gives you options to choose among a wide number of English translations - even setting up two parallel columns to compare as you read. Tap an icon and you can even listen to the passages read.  It is a great way to support your Bible reading goals using a smartphone, iPad or computer.

My Favorite Bible Reading Plan EVER!!

About 6 months ago I began using a reading plan produced by BibleProject.com called One Story that Leads to Jesus.  Their description:

One Story that Leads to Jesus is a plan designed by BibleProject to inspire you to read through the entire Bible in one year. This plan incorporates over 150 animated videos to engage you in the Bible’s brilliant literary design and flow of thought. Choose this one-year reading plan for an epic learning journey that helps you experience the Bible as a unified story that leads to Jesus.

CLICK HERE to see the plan page.

It has been a phenomenal support to my daily Bible reading.  Each day usually begins with a helpful teaching video outlining or giving background for that particular book, character, concept or historical setting.

Then some reading - and I use both the NIV and NLT in parallel.  I can tap into cross-references and other information.

Each day closes with a Psalm - that I listen to for a change of pace.

I'm now about 2 months away from finished - it's easy and inviting to do several days at a time when my schedule permits.

How To Access and Use This Value Resource

For Smartphone or iPad or other Tablet

  • Go to the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and install the free YouVersion Bible App + Audio by Life.Church.

In Web Browser on Your Computer

  • Go to Bible.com

You will need to create your own free account to log on, personalize and then start reading on whatever device you choose.